Gus Shaw Gus Shaw's Profile Page

Gus Shaw Gus Shaw

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

AD0-E902 Exam Duration | AD0-E902 Valid Exam Syllabus

As for the points you may elapse or being frequently tested in the real exam, we give referent information, then involved them into our AD0-E902 actual exam. Our experts expertise about AD0-E902 training materials is unquestionable considering their long-time research and compile. I believe that no one can know the AD0-E902 Exam Questions better than them. And they always keep a close eye on the changes of the content and displays of the AD0-E902 study guide.

Adobe AD0-E902 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Working with APIs: This section of the exam measures the skills of Integration Specialists and assesses knowledge of API interactions within Fusion. Candidates must handle rate-limiting errors, identify ways to integrate third-party APIs and determine the correct module types when built-in functionalities are unavailable. One critical skill evaluated is implementing a solution for API rate limits to ensure seamless integration.

Topic 2

Foundational Technical Concepts: This section of the exam measures the skills of Fusion Developers and covers core technical concepts related to data transformation, function nesting, and expression formation in Fusion. Candidates must understand how to modify field formats, use appropriate functions, and work with data manipulation techniques. One key skill evaluated is selecting the correct function to transform data between different formats.

Topic 3

Scenario Design and Architecture: This section of the exam measures the skills of Solution Architects and focuses on designing and structuring Fusion scenarios efficiently. Candidates must determine the correct steps to parse JSON, perform data lookups, and distinguish between different triggers. Understanding system limitations, module selection, and timezone handling is also essential. One key skill assessed is identifying the appropriate method for uploading documents while managing access controls.

Topic 4

Testing and Error Handling: This section of the exam measures the skills of Quality Assurance Engineers and evaluates the principles of testing and error handling in Fusion. Candidates must define test plans and test cases, identify directives for handling unreliable services, and configure custom error handling mechanisms. One specific skill tested is applying the correct error-handling directive to manage service disruptions.

>> AD0-E902 Exam Duration <<

AD0-E902 Exam Duration 100% Pass | High-quality AD0-E902 Valid Exam Syllabus: Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional

Before you really attend the AD0-E902 exam and choose your materials, we want to remind you of the importance of holding a certificate like this one. Obtaining a AD0-E902 certificate likes this one can help you master a lot of agreeable outcomes in the future, like higher salary, the opportunities to promotion and being trusted by the superiors and colleagues. Our AD0-E902 Exam Questions can help you achieve all of your dreams.

Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional Sample Questions (Q13-Q18):

NEW QUESTION # 13
To meet compliance standards, a user must include a process that tracks every Workfront project update created by Fusion.
What can they do to address this business requirement?

A. Create a Note record related to the record updated
B. Update the External Reference ID with User ID and Timestamp
C. Use reporting on the Last Updated by ID and Last Update Date

Answer: A

Explanation:
Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Problem Summary:
* The organization requires a process to track every project update made by Fusion to meet compliance standards.
* This process must provide a clear audit trail of updates, including details like user and timestamp.
* Option Analysis:
* A. Use reporting on the Last Updated by ID and Last Update Date:
* While this provides basic reporting, it only reflects the most recent update and does not maintain a comprehensive history of changes over time.
* B. Update the External Reference ID with User ID and Timestamp:
* Updating the External Reference ID could cause issues if this field is used for other purposes. It is not designed for logging multiple updates.
* C. Create a Note record related to the record updated:
* Correct. Creating a Note record for each update ensures that every change is logged with relevant details (e.g., user, timestamp, update reason). This approach creates a full audit trail that is easily accessible and reportable.
* Why Note Records are Best:
* Audit Trail: Notes provide a clear and searchable history of updates for each project.
* Compliance: Ensures compliance by documenting who made what changes and when.
* Flexibility: Notes can include custom details such as update reasons or additional context, making them more robust than standard fields.
* Implementation:
* In the Fusion scenario, add a module to create a Note record after each update.
* Populate the Note with relevant details, such as:
* User ID ({lastUpdatedBy})
* Timestamp ({lastUpdateDate})
* Description of the change.

NEW QUESTION # 14
A user notices that all task due dates for an organization are in the wrong time zone.
What is the simplest way to change the time zone so that it applies to all dates used in the organization's scenarios?

A. Change the Fusion organization's time zone
B. Change the scenario's time zone default
C. Set a variable for every date in the scenario that formats the date to the desired time zone by using the formatDate function
D. Change the time zone in the computer's localization settings

Answer: A

Explanation:
* Understanding the Issue:
* The user observes that all task due dates are incorrect due to a mismatch in the time zone.
* The solution must ensure that the correct time zone is applied universally across all scenarios and dates within the organization's Fusion instance.
* Why Option B is Correct:
* Fusion Organization's Time Zone Setting:
* Changing the time zone at theorganization levelensures that all scenarios within the organization adopt the updated time zone setting.
* This change applies globally, making it the simplest and most efficient method to ensure consistency across all dates and scenarios.
* This adjustment prevents the need for scenario-specific or localized changes, saving time and reducing errors.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option A ("Set a variable for every date using formatDate"):
* While the formatDate function can adjust time zones for individual dates, applying this approach to every date in every scenario is highly inefficient and error-prone. It does not offer a global solution.
* Option C ("Change the scenario's time zone default"):
* Scenarios in Fusion do not have a specific "time zone default" setting. The organization's time zone setting is the controlling factor.
* Option D ("Change the time zone in the computer's localization settings"):
* Fusion scenarios run on cloud servers, not the user's local machine. Changing the computer's time zone would have no effect on the scenarios' behavior.
* Steps to Change the Organization's Time Zone:
* Log in to Adobe Workfront Fusion.
* Navigate to theOrganization Settings:
* Go to theAdmin Panelor the organization settings section.
* Locate theTime Zonesetting.
* Select the desired time zone from the dropdown list.
* Save the changes.
* All scenarios will now adopt the updated time zone setting.
* How This Solves the Problem:
* Changing the organization's time zone applies a consistent time zone across all dates used in scenarios. This ensures accuracy without requiring individual scenario adjustments or manual interventions.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Organization Settings
* Workfront Community: Best Practices for Time Zone Configuration

NEW QUESTION # 15
A customer wants all their Salesforce Opportunities to sync with their connected projects in Workfront - approximately 20,000+ projects.
After the admin sets a Workfront Fusion scenario to run each night and perform this action, the scenario is run once to test. After 40 minutes, it unexpectedly stops running.
Why did this occur?

A. Workfront has a limit to the number of API calls it can receive and stopped the scenario from running
B. The Workfront API stops integration webhooks if they are hit more than 2000 times in a 10 minute period
C. Workfront Fusion occasionally times out if trying to process over 2000 records within a 40-minute period
D. Workfront Fusion has an execution timeout and likely stopped the scenario from running

Answer: D

Explanation:
* Understanding the Issue:
* The customer is syncing20,000+ Salesforce Opportunitieswith Workfront projects using a scheduled Fusion scenario.
* After running for 40 minutes, the scenario unexpectedly stops.
* Why Option C is Correct:
* Workfront Fusion Execution Timeout:
* Fusion scenarios have a default execution timeout of40 minutesper run.
* If the scenario exceeds this time limit, Fusion automatically stops the execution to avoid resource overuse.
* Handling Large Data Sets:
* Scenarios involving large datasets (like syncing 20,000+ records) may require optimizations, such as breaking the data into smaller chunks using paginated requests or iterators.
* In this case, the scenario stopped because the execution timeout was reached, not due to API limits or webhook restrictions.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option A ("Workfront API call limit"):
* While Workfront does have API rate limits, they are generally generous and not the reason for the scenario stopping. Fusion scenarios are designed to manage API calls efficiently.
* Option B ("Fusion times out if processing over 2000 records in 40 minutes"):
* This is incorrect because Fusion does not have a hard limit on the number of records processed in 40 minutes. The timeout is time-based, not record-based.
* Option D ("Workfront API stops webhooks after 2000 hits in 10 minutes"):
* This does not apply to Fusion scenarios. Webhooks are separate from the API calls initiated by Fusion.
* How to Resolve the Issue:
* Split the Data: Use pagination or batch processing to divide the 20,000+ records into smaller chunks (e.g., 1,000 or 2,000 records per run).
* Adjust Scheduling: Schedule the scenario to run more frequently with smaller batches, ensuring all records are synced over multiple runs.
* Use Iterators: Add an Iterator module to loop through smaller subsets of data, preventing the scenario from exceeding the execution timeout.
* Steps to Optimize the Scenario:
* Add aSearch Moduleto retrieve opportunities in smaller batches (e.g., using limits or pagination parameters).
* Use aRepeater Moduleto process each batch iteratively.
* Save the scenario and schedule it to run nightly or more frequently, depending on the sync requirements.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion: Execution Timeout Limits
* Workfront Community: Managing Large Data Sets in Fusion Scenarios
By optimizing the scenario to handle smaller batches of data, the admin can avoid the execution timeout issue and ensure successful syncing of Salesforce Opportunities with Workfront projects.

NEW QUESTION # 16
What information can be understood from the images of this bundle inspector?

A. The trigger module returned 29 bundles of task data with only the task ID. name, and planned completion date getting passed to the second module in the scenario
B. The project name and planned completion date were changed in the trigger module because the input and output fields in the second module are the same
C. The first module delivered 29 bundles of data to the second module. Data manipulations happened in the second module to change the project name and planned completion date
D. The trigger module returned 1 bundle of project data with only the project ID, name, and planned completion date getting passed to the second module in the scenario

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Understanding the Scenario:
* The scenario includes two modules:
* Workfront Search Module: Fetches data (likely project details).
* Tools Module: Manipulates and sets multiple variables.
* What the Images Show:
* Workfront Search Module (First Module):
* The output indicates29 bundlesof project data were retrieved.
* Each bundle contains fields such asID,name, andplannedCompletionDate.
* Tools Module (Second Module):
* The data from the Workfront module is processed to set variables likeProject Nameand Project Due Date.
* Output includes transformed values, such as appending the approver's name ("Joan Harris") to the project name and updating the project due date.
* Why Option C is Correct:
* Delivery of 29 Bundles: The Workfront module retrieved 29 project bundles and passed them to the Tools module.
* Data Manipulation in Tools Module: The second module modified the data, such as appending
"Joan Harris" to the project name and updating the due date to a different value. This is evident from the changes in the output of the Tools module compared to the input from the Workfront module.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option A:
* Incorrect because theWorkfront moduleretrieved 29 bundles, not just 1 bundle.
Additionally, the project name and planned completion date were manipulated in the second module, not the first.
* Option B:
* Incorrect because the retrieved data pertains to projects, not tasks.
* Option D:
* Incorrect because theinput and output fields in the Tools moduleare not identical. The data was clearly manipulated within the Tools module.
* How This Scenario Operates:
* The Workfront module fetches raw data, which is then processed in the Tools module. The processed variables (e.g., modified project names and due dates) are prepared for further use in subsequent scenario steps.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Bundle Inspector
* Workfront Community: Using Tools Module for Data Manipulation
The correct interpretation is that the first module delivered 29 bundles to the second module, where data manipulations occurred to modify the project name and planned completion date.

NEW QUESTION # 17
A source system should provide a Workfront task ID, but queries keep resulting in an error.
Which module helps determine if the task ID is valid?

A. Read Related Record
B. Read Record
C. Search Record

Answer: C

Explanation:
To determine if a task ID is valid in Workfront, you can use theSearch Recordmodule. This module allows you to search for records, such as tasks, within Workfront based on a given ID.
* Search Record Module:
* This module can be used to search for a specific task in Workfront by its task ID.
* If the task ID is valid, it will return the task details; if the task ID is invalid, it will return an error or no results.
* TheSearch Recordmodule is designed to check if a specific record exists in Workfront, making it ideal for verifying the validity of a task ID.
* Why Not Other Options?
* A. Read Record: This module reads a specific record by ID but does not search across multiple records. It may not provide the flexibility needed to check if a task ID is valid without knowing the exact task ID.
* B. Read Related Record: This module is used to read a related record (e.g., reading the project related to a task). It is not suitable for validating a task ID directly.
References:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Search Record Module Usage
* Experience League Community: Verifying Record IDs in Workfront Fusion

NEW QUESTION # 18
......

You can directly refer our Adobe AD0-E902 study materials to prepare the exam. Once the newest test syllabus is issued by the official, our experts will quickly make a detailed summary about all knowledge points of the real Adobe AD0-E902 Exam in the shortest time. All in all, our AD0-E902 exam quiz will help you grasp all knowledge points.

AD0-E902 Valid Exam Syllabus: https://www.itpassleader.com/Adobe/AD0-E902-dumps-pass-exam.html

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

Gus Shaw Gus Shaw

Biography

COOKIE NOTICE