Grace Harris Grace Harris's Profile Page

Grace Harris Grace Harris

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Examsfragen - ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Online Tests

Um Ihre PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfungen reibungslos erfolgreich zu meistern, brauchen Sie nur unsere Prüfungsfragen und Antworten zu PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Dumps (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam) auswendigzulernen. Viel Erfolg!

Die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierung wird weltweit anerkannt und von Organisationen hoch geschätzt, die die Sicherheit ihrer Informationsvermögenswerte gewährleisten möchten. Mit dieser Zertifizierung können Sie Ihr Engagement für die Aufrechterhaltung höchster Sicherheitsstandards und Ihre Fähigkeit zur Implementierung und Aufrechterhaltung eines wirksamen ISMS demonstrieren.

Die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-Prüfung ist eine wesentliche Zertifizierung für Fachleute, die Experten in der Prüfung von Informationssicherheitsmanagementsystemen werden möchten. Diese Zertifizierung ist von Organisationen hoch geschätzt und zeigt, dass der Inhaber die erforderlichen Fähigkeiten und Kenntnisse hat, um effektive Audits durchzuführen, die den Anforderungen von ISO/IEC 27001 entsprechen. Wenn Sie Ihre Karriere im Bereich des Informationssicherheitsmanagements verbessern möchten, ist die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-Zertifizierung definitiv eine Überlegung wert.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Examsfragen <<

Neueste ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Pass Guide & neue Prüfung ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor braindumps & 100% Erfolgsquote

Die PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfung zu bestehen ist eigentlich nicht leicht. Trotzdem ist die Zertifizierung nicht nur ein Beweis für Ihre IT-Fähigkeit, sondern auch ein weltweit anerkannter Durchgangsausweis. Auf PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor vorzubereiten darf man nicht blindlings. Die Technik-Gruppe von uns DeutschPrüfung haben die Prüfungssoftware der PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor nach der Mnemotechnik entwickelt. Sie kann mit vernünftiger Methode Ihre Belastungen der Vorbereitung auf PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor erleichtern.

Die PECB ISO-IC-27001-Lead-Aughitor-Prüfung ist eine strenge Bewertung, die das Wissen und die Fähigkeiten einer Person im Informationssicherheitsmanagement und der Prüfung testet. Durch die Erlangung dieser Zertifizierung können Einzelpersonen ihre Expertise in diesem Bereich nachweisen und ihre Karrieremöglichkeiten erhöhen, während Unternehmen von der Einstellung von zertifizierten Fachleuten profitieren können, um die Sicherheit ihrer Informationen zu gewährleisten.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q245-Q250):

245. Frage
You are performing an ISMS initial certification audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services. The next step in your audit plan is to conduct the closing meeting. During the final audit team meeting, as an audit team leader, you agree to report 2 minor nonconformities and 1 opportunity for improvement as below:

Select one option of the recommendation to the audit programme manager you are going to advise to the auditee at the closing meeting.

A. Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date
B. Recommend certification immediately
C. Recommend certification after your approval of the proposed corrective action plan Recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year
D. Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months
E. Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months

Antwort: C

Begründung:
According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, which specifies the requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, clause 9.4.9 requires the certification body to make a certification decision based on the information obtained during the audit and any other relevant information1. The certification body should also consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee to address any nonconformities identified during the audit1. Therefore, when making a recommendation to the audit programme manager, an ISMS auditor should consider the nature and severity of the nonconformities and the proposed corrective actions.
Based on the scenario above, the auditor should recommend certification after their approval of the proposed corrective action plan and recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year. The auditor should provide the following justification for their recommendation:
* Justification: This recommendation is appropriate because it reflects the fact that the auditee has only two minor nonconformities and one opportunity for improvement, which do not indicate a significant or systemic failure of their ISMS. A minor nonconformity is defined as a failure to achieve one or more requirements of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or a situation which raises significant doubt about the ability of an ISMS process to achieve its intended output, but does not affect its overall effectiveness or conformity2. An opportunity for improvement is defined as a suggestion for improvement beyond what is required by ISO/IEC 27001:20222. Therefore, these findings do not prevent or preclude certification, as long as they are addressed by appropriate corrective actions within a reasonable time frame. The auditor should approve the proposed corrective action plan before recommending certification, to ensure that it is realistic, achievable, and effective. The auditor should also recommend that the findings can be closed out at a surveillance audit in 1 year, to verify that the corrective actions have been implemented and are working as intended.
The other options are not valid recommendations for the audit programme manager, as they are either too lenient or too strict for the given scenario. For example:
* Recommend certification immediately: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor ignores or accepts the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO
19011:20182, which provides guidelines for auditing management systems. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to consider the effectiveness of the corrective actions taken by the auditee before making a certification decision.
* Recommend that a full scope re-audit is required within 6 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor overreacts or exaggerates the nonconformities, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:
20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a re-audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors. A full scope re-audit is usually reserved for major nonconformities or multiple minor nonconformities that indicate a serious or widespread failure of an ISMS.
* Recommend that an unannounced audit is carried out at a future date: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor distrusts or doubts the auditee's commitment or capability to implement corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to conduct unannounced audits only under certain conditions, such as when there are indications of serious problems with an ISMS or when required by sector-specific schemes.
* Recommend that a partial audit is required within 3 months: This option is not valid because it implies that the auditor imposes or prescribes a specific time frame or scope for verifying corrective actions, which is contrary to the audit principles and objectives of ISO 19011:20182. It also contradicts the requirement of ISO/IEC 17021-1:20151, which requires the certification body to determine whether a partial audit is necessary based on the nature and extent of nonconformities and other relevant factors.
A partial audit may be appropriate for minor nonconformities, but the time frame and scope should be agreed upon with the auditee and based on the proposed corrective action plan.
References: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 - Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements, ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

246. Frage
What is the difference between a restricted and confidential document?

A. Restricted - to be shared among named individuals
Confidential - to be shared among an authorized group
B. Restricted - to be shared among an authorized group
Confidential - to be shared among named individuals
C. Restricted - to be shared among named individuals
Confidential - to be shared with friends and family
D. Restricted - to be shared among named individuals
Confidential - to be shared across the organization only

Antwort: A

Begründung:
The difference between a restricted and confidential document is that a restricted document is to be shared among named individuals, while a confidential document is to be shared among an authorized group. Restricted and confidential are examples of information classification levels that indicate the sensitivity and value of information and the degree of protection required for it. Restricted documents contain information that could cause serious damage or harm to the organization or its stakeholders if disclosed to unauthorized persons. Therefore, they should only be accessed by specific individuals who have a legitimate need to know and are authorized by the information owner. Confidential documents contain information that could cause damage or harm to the organization or its stakeholders if disclosed to unauthorized persons. Therefore, they should only be accessed by a defined group of people who have a legitimate need to know and are authorized by the information owner. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requires the organization to classify information in terms of legal requirements, value, criticality and sensitivity to unauthorized disclosure or modification (see clause A.8.2.1). Reference: CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is Information Classification?

247. Frage
All are prohibited in acceptable use of information assets, except:

A. Company-wide e-mails with supervisor/TL permission.
B. Messages with very large attachments or to a large number ofrecipients.
C. Electronic chain letters
D. E-mail copies to non-essential readers

Antwort: A

Begründung:
The only option that is not prohibited in acceptable use of information assets is C: company-wide e-mails with supervisor/TL permission. This option implies that the sender has obtained the necessary authorization from their supervisor or team leader to send an e-mail to all employees in the organization. This could be done for legitimate business purposes, such as announcing important news, events or updates that are relevant to everyone. However, this option should still be used sparingly and responsibly, as it could cause unnecessary disruption or annoyance to the recipients if abused or misused. The other options are prohibited in acceptable use of information assets, as they could violate the information security policies and procedures of the organization, as well as waste resources and bandwidth. Electronic chain letters (A) are messages that urge recipients to forward them to multiple other people, often with false or misleading claims or promises. They are considered spam and could contain malicious links or attachments that could compromise information security. E-mail copies to non-essential readers (B) are messages that are sent to recipients who do not need to receive them or have no interest in them. They are considered unnecessary and could clutter the inbox and distract the recipients from more important messages. Messages with very large attachments or to a large number of recipients (D) are messages that consume a lot of network resources and could affect the performance or availability of the information systems. They could also exceed the storage capacity or quota limits of the recipients' mailboxes and cause problems for them. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 requires the organization to implement rules for acceptable use of assets (see clause A.8.1.3). Reference: CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is Acceptable Use?

248. Frage
Auditor competence is a combination of knowledge and skills. Which two of the following activities are predominately related to "knowledge"?

A. Follow an audit trail deviating from the prepared checklist
B. Understanding how to identify findings
C. Determining what evidence to gather
D. Designing a checklist
E. Communicate with the auditee
F. Determining how to seek evidence from the auditee

Antwort: C,D

Begründung:
Knowledge is the understanding of facts, concepts, principles, theories and practices related to a specific subject or discipline. Skills are the ability to apply knowledge and use know-how to complete tasks and solve problems. According to ISO 19011:2018, the knowledge and skills of an auditor include the following:
Knowledge of audit principles, procedures and methods
Knowledge of management system standards and reference documents
Knowledge of the organization's context, scope, processes and objectives Knowledge of relevant legal, regulatory and contractual requirements Knowledge of applicable industry, sector or technical disciplines Knowledge of risk management and risk-based thinking Skill in collecting and verifying information Skill in evaluating conformity and effectiveness of management systems Skill in reporting and communicating audit results Skill in managing audit activities and teams Based on this, the activities that are predominately related to knowledge are designing a checklist and determining what evidence to gather, as they require the auditor to understand the audit criteria, scope, objectives and methods, as well as the organization's context, processes and risks. The other activities are more related to skills, as they involve applying knowledge and using know-how to perform tasks and solve problems during the audit.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Guidelines for auditing management systems, clauses 7.2.1, 7.2.2 and 7.2.3 PECB Candidate Handbook - ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, pages 9-10 and 16-17 ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on: Auditing Competence, pages 2-3 and 8

249. Frage
As the ISMS audit team leader, you are conducting a second-party audit of an international logistics company on behalf of an online retailer. During the audit, one of your team members reports a nonconformity relating to control 5.18 (Access rights) of Appendix A of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. She found evidence that removing the server access protocols of 20 people who left in the last 3 months took up to 1 week whereas the policy required removing access within 24 hours of their departure.
Complete the sentence with the best word(s), dick on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, you may drag and drop the option to the appropriate blank section.

Antwort:

Begründung:

Explanation:
The purpose of including access rights in an information management system to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is to provide, review, modify and remove these permissions in accordance with the organisation's policy and rules for access control.
Access rights are the permissions granted to users or groups of users to access, use, modify, or delete information assets. Access rights should be aligned with the organisation's access control policy, which defines the objectives, principles, roles, and responsibilities for managing access to information systems.
Access rights should also follow the organisation's rules for access control, which specify the criteria, procedures, and controls for granting, reviewing, modifying, and revoking access rights. The purpose of including access rights in an information management system is to ensure that only authorised users can access information assets according to their business needs and roles, and to prevent unauthorised or inappropriate access that could compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of information assets. References:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A Control 5.181
ISO/IEC 27002:2022 Control 5.182
CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Training Course3

250. Frage
......

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Online Tests: https://www.deutschpruefung.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-deutsch-pruefungsfragen.html

Cookie	Duration	Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional	11 months	The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance	11 months	This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy	11 months	The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.

Grace Harris Grace Harris

Biography

COOKIE NOTICE